Tag: ICRA

  • How reliable is ICRA Nepal rating?

    How reliable is ICRA Nepal rating?


    Anyone with long experience can tell the predictive power of ICRA Nepal’s rating? Do those that get low ratings end up with low market price and high rating get high market price?


    View on r/NepalStock by Exact-Intention-9463


  • “ICRA Nepal Gives Unitech Hydropower B+ Issuer Rating Signaling High Default Risk”

    “ICRA Nepal Gives Unitech Hydropower B+ Issuer Rating Signaling High Default Risk”


     

     

    ICRA Nepal Limited has given Unitech Hydropower Company Limited an issuer rating of [ICRANP-IR] B+. This rating signifies that Unitech Hydropower Company Limited carries a high risk of not meeting its financial obligations on time. It’s essential to understand that this rating is a general assessment of the company’s creditworthiness and is not tied to any specific debt instrument.

    For these rating categories, ranging from [ICRANP-IR] AA to [ICRANP-IR] C, a plus (+) or minus (-) sign may be added to indicate their position within the category. In this case, [ICRANP-IR] B+ is slightly better than [ICRANP-IR] B, while [ICRANP-IR] B- is slightly lower than [ICRANP-IR] B.

  • “ICRA Nepal Rates SY Panel Nepal with BB Issuer Rating, Signifying Moderate Default Risk”

    “ICRA Nepal Rates SY Panel Nepal with BB Issuer Rating, Signifying Moderate Default Risk”


    ICRA Nepal Limited has assigned a credit rating of [ICRANP-IR] BB (pronounced as ICRA NP Issuer Rating double B) to SY Panel Nepal Limited. This rating indicates that SY Panel Nepal Limited carries a moderate risk of not meeting its financial obligations in a timely manner. It’s important to note that this rating reflects a general assessment of the company’s creditworthiness and is not specific to any particular debt instrument.

    For this rating scale, which ranges from [ICRANP-IR] AA to [ICRANP-IR] C, plus (+) or minus (-) signs may be added to the rating symbols to show their relative position within the respective categories. Therefore, [ICRANP-IR] BB+ signifies a slightly higher rating than [ICRANP-IR] BB, whereas [ICRANP-IR] BB- represents a slightly lower rating than [ICRANP-IR] BB.

     

  • “ICRA Nepal Reaffirms AMC Quality 3 Rating for Citizens Capital’s Management”

    “ICRA Nepal Reaffirms AMC Quality 3 Rating for Citizens Capital’s Management”


     

    ICRA Nepal Limited has confirmed the Fund Management Quality Rating (FMQR) of [ICRANP] AMC Quality 3 (pronounced ICRA NP Asset Management Company Quality Three) for Citizens Capital Limited. This rating signifies that entities with AMC3 offer reasonable confidence in their management quality. It’s important to note that ICRA Nepal’s assessment doesn’t comment on legal adherence, financial performance, or future outlook of schemes overseen by the Asset Management Company.

    ICRA Nepal employs a rating scale ranging from AMC1 to AMC5, where AMC1 reflects the strongest management quality assurance, while AMC5 indicates weaker assurance in management quality. In cases of quality Ratings 2, 3, and 4, a “+” (Plus) sign can be added to indicate a relatively better position within the respective rating categories.

  • “ICRA Nepal Reaffirms BB+ Issuer Rating for Mid Solu Hydropower, Signaling Moderate Default Risk”

    “ICRA Nepal Reaffirms BB+ Issuer Rating for Mid Solu Hydropower, Signaling Moderate Default Risk”


     

    ICRA Nepal Limited has reaffirmed the issuer rating of Mid Solu Hydropower Limited as BB+, which means they have a moderate risk of default in timely servicing of financial obligations. The rating is an overall opinion on the creditworthiness of the company and not tied to any specific debt instrument.

  • ICRA Nepal confirms the rating of NIC ASIA Bank’s Rs 3 arba debenture as ICRANP LBBB.

    ICRA Nepal confirms the rating of NIC ASIA Bank’s Rs 3 arba debenture as ICRANP LBBB.


     

    ICRA Nepal Limited has confirmed NIC Asia Bank Limited’s grade. The rating has been removed from the ‘Watch with Negative Implications’ category and moved to the “Issuer Not Cooperating” category, with the following notification for rating withdrawal:

    The rating agency has assessed the bank’s NPR 3,000 million subordinated debenture as [ICRANP] LBBB “Issuer Not Cooperating”; it has been withdrawn from watch with negative implications and moved to the issuer not cooperating category with notice of withdraw