20.1 C
Kathmandu
Wednesday, October 20, 2021
More
    Nepal Breaking NewsGeneral NewsA petition has been filed with the Supreme Court to have Foreign...

    A petition has been filed with the Supreme Court to have Foreign Khadka’s swearing annulled

    Must Read

    At the request of the Foreign Narayan Khadka, an application has been filed with the Supreme Court, claiming that the oath was taken without any legal foundation and that it should be quashed.

    Khadka was sworn in as Foreign by President on September 22. The President also administered the oath of office and confidentiality.

    - Advertisement -

    In a case filed with the Supreme Court, the petitioners demand that the oath taken by the foreign be revoked, according to Baburam Dahal, a spokesperson for the Supreme Court.

    The petition was by advocate Bishal Neupane, who argued that the oath taken without a legal foundation should be declared invalid until a legal framework is put in place.

    - Advertisement -

    Mr. Aziz has cited Article 80 of the constitution, which states that the president and all cabinet members must take the oath of office and secrecy before the president, and that state secretaries and assistant ministers must take the oath and secrecy before the prime minister, in accordance with federal law, prior to taking up their respective positions.

    However, at the moment, there is no law governing the oath taken by the prime minister, the deputy prime minister, and cabinet ministers.

    Ordinances relating to oaths were among the 14 ordinances that were declared null and void at midnight on September 15 because they had been on the books for more than 60 days after being registered in the House of Representatives.

    With the abolition of the ordinance, there is no longer any law governing the taking of the oath.

    The other method of ensuring that a legislation on oath taking was passed was through the submission of a bill in the Parliament.

    Advocate Neupane has stated in his petition that the oath taken by Foreign Minister Narayan Khadka was unconstitutional because it was administered “without any legal basis,” as the constitution states “as per federal law.” “The oath [taken by the foreign minister] is unconstitutional and it must be scrapped,” Neupane has stated in his petition. “The oath should be taken in accordance with the new law whenever it is passed by the government.”

    According to Neupane, a hearing on his appeal has been scheduled for this Wednesday morning.

    If the Supreme Court rules on Wednesday that Foreign Minister Khadka’s oath of office should be annulled, Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba’s intention to give his Council of Ministers a makeover within a few days may be jeopardised.

    The ordinance that had been introduced to amend some provisions of the Parties Act 2017 was repealed on Tuesday, and Prime Minister Deuba has been preparing to expand his Cabinet by inducting ministers from coalition partners, including the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre), the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Socialist), and the Janata Samajbadi Party.

    If a court orders the cancellation of Khadka’s oath, it will be pointless to nominate ministers because they will be unable to undertake their respective positions because they will not have taken the oath, as stipulated by constitutional provisions.

    In the of authorities from the Federal Parliament Secretariat, it takes at least one month for a law to become effective.


    You May Also Like

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Latest News

    Nepal Stock Exchange Ltd.

    As of 2021-10-20 15:00:00 ...

    More Articles Like This